← backContent & WritingFounding · Free forever

Rewrite copy for a different audience or tone

The side-by-side diff makes it easy to spot where Claude over-edited.

by @whitney · recommended tool Claude · 0 unlocks

0

EXAMPLES · WHAT THIS PROMPT PRODUCES

Sample output
Rewritten for **busy primary-care physicians** in a **direct, evidence-first** voice.

| Original | Rewrite | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| "Unlock a new era of wellness with our revolutionary supplement blend." | "This formulation targets three measurable markers of metabolic health." | Swapped hype for a clinical claim physicians can evaluate. |
| "Our holistic approach nourishes your body, mind, and spirit." | "Each dose delivers 400mg magnesium glycinate and 2g omega-3, dosed to published trial ranges." | Replaced vague wellness language with specifics a clinician needs. |
| "Feel amazing every single day, naturally!" | "In a 12-week study, 68% of participants reported improved sleep latency." | Traded an emotional promise for a citable outcome. |
| "Thousands of happy customers can't be wrong." | "Reviewed by a board-certified endocrinologist; ingredient sourcing is third-party tested." | Shifted social proof from volume to credibility signals physicians trust. |
| "Try it risk-free today and transform your life!" | "Request a sample and the full ingredient panel for your own review." | Reframed CTA around professional evaluation, not consumer urgency. |

**Preserved:** the core claims (metabolic support, sleep, ingredient quality), the section order, and the headline trial stat.
**Note:** Original emotional intensity was intentionally lowered; if this targets a clinician newsletter, that read is correct. If repurposing for patients, restore warmth in the closing line.
PRICE HISTORY0 cr · current

PROMPT TEMPLATE · v1.0.0

Rewrite the attached copy for <NEW_AUDIENCE> in a <NEW_TONE> voice.
Preserve: core claims, structure, key stats.
Change: vocabulary level, examples, references.
Return a side-by-side diff (original → rewrite) with a one-line rationale per change.

RESULTS · WHAT PEOPLE GOT

0
Sign in to show colleagues what this case produced.
No results posted yet. Used this case? Show colleagues what it produced.

DISCUSSION

0 comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet — be the first.

MORE LIKE THIS